Skip to content 
Understanding HEPA Filter and ULPA filtration standards is a major priority for industries across the Middle East, particularly in pharmaceuticals, healthcare, and advanced manufacturing. For years, the European standard EN 1822 was the go-to benchmark for high-efficiency air filters. However, the introduction of the global standard ISO 29463 changed how we look at filter testing and classification.
At K Filter, we build products designed to thrive in challenging environments. Navigating the relationship between EN 1822 and ISO 29463 is essential to ensuring your facility meets strict cleanroom compliance.
Here is a practical breakdown of how these two standards interact and what it means for your operations.
The Core Difference: Regional vs. Global
EN 1822 is a European standard that established a rigorous classification system for EPA, HEPA, and ULPA filters. It evaluates filter efficiency based on individual particle counting methods.
ISO 29463 is an international standard that grew out of EN 1822. Its main goal is to create a unified framework across global markets. This makes it easier for operators from Riyadh to Dubai to evaluate and compare filter performance regardless of where the product was manufactured.
Instead of replacing EN 1822 entirely, the two standards now work together. In Europe and many markets aligned with European protocols, the revised EN 1822-1 retains its classic classification names (such as H13 or H14) but utilizes the modern testing procedures laid out in ISO 29463 Parts 2 through 5.
How Filter Classes Compare
While ISO 29463 introduces 13 distinct filter categories ranging from ISO 15 E to ISO 75 U, it maintains the fundamental baseline of the original European structure.
The evaluation process for both standards rests on a critical metric: the Most Penetrating Particle Size (MPPS). This identifies the exact, specific particle size that slips through a filter media most easily. If a filter can reliably catch particles at its MPPS, it will capture larger and smaller particles with even greater efficiency.
The cross-reference between the classifications is direct, with one notable exception:
- Efficient Particulate Air (EPA): EN 1822 classes E11 and E12 match up directly with ISO 15 E and ISO 20 E. Interestingly, ISO 29463 does not include a direct equivalent for the older E10 class. For that specific level of efficiency, industries now look to the ISO 16890 standard, specifically the ISO ePM1 greater than 95% group.
- High-Efficiency Particulate Air (HEPA): The classic H13 and H14 filters match up with ISO 35 H and ISO 40 H. These require an overall efficiency of 99.95% and 99.995% respectively.
- Ultra-Low Penetration Air (ULPA): The highest tier, covering U15 through U17, aligns with ISO 45 U through ISO 75 U, filtering up to 99.999995% of particles at MPPS.
Critical Variations in Leak Testing
While the efficiency categories match up cleanly, the actual execution of testing reveals a few operational differences, particularly regarding leak testing.
EN 1822 is generally considered to hold a more restrictive stance on leak detection methodologies. For instance, EN 1822 strictly prohibits the use of aerosol photometers for localized leak testing in manufacturing.
Additionally, while ISO 29463 outlines five distinct leak testing methods within its framework, the European counterpart accepts only three. Both standards mention materials like PSL (Polystyrene Latex) for testing, but in practical manufacturing environments, alternatives like DEHS and PAO remain the industry standards due to the extreme costs associated with PSL procedures.
Why This Matters for Middle Eastern Facilities
Operating cleanrooms in the Middle East involves managing unique environmental challenges, including high ambient dust loads and intense cooling demands. Selecting the right air filtration depends on accurate, verifiable testing data.
When you specify a filter class for an ISO 14644-1 cleanroom, knowing whether your supplier tests under EN 1822 or ISO 29463 ensures you receive the exact level of particle arrestance required to protect your processes.
At K Filter, we combine regional manufacturing expertise with these global testing frameworks to ensure every HEPA and ULPA system provides reliable, transparent performance where it matters most.
